Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco M3, getting a global score of 79.1 against 78.2. The LG V30 design is extremely lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3, even though it was released many years before. LG V30 features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Poco M3. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The LG V30 has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better display density. The LG V30 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V30 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco M3 captures clearer videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a much more mega pixels camera and a much bigger sensor.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a superior battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Poco M3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Poco M3, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.