Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-11-27 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 396 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.78 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M3, having a general score of 84.7 against 78.2. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while Xiaomi Poco M3 works with Android 10 operating system. Although Samsung Galaxy A32 and Xiaomi Poco M3 were released only a few months apart, Samsung Galaxy A32's design is just a little bit heavier but also a little thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A32 has a processor that is just as good as Xiaomi Poco M3's processing unit, both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a much better video definition.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A32, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.