Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 149.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco M3 is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a general score of 78.2 against 77.8. The Xiaomi Poco M3 body is a bit lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's much thicker and was released 3 years before. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco M3 has an older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480px resolution, a larger display and a bit greater pixels amount per inch in the screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a really superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a higher resolution back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a bit superior battery performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Xiaomi Poco M3 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.