Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3, having a global score of 85.5 against 78.2. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is older than Xiaomi Poco M3, it's body is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2246 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. Xiaomi Poco M3 captures clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a camera with a much better resolution, a bigger aperture and a lot bigger sensor.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a very superior battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Poco M3, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.