Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-11 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X2, with a score of 84.5 against 79.3. Apple iPhone XS Max is a somewhat thinner phone than the Xiaomi Poco X2, but both have the same weight. The iPhone XS Max has a faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a sharper display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688px. The Xiaomi Poco X2 captures better videos and photos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
IPhone XS Max features as much storage to install applications and games as the Xiaomi Poco X2 one, both of them have equal internal storage. The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a very superior battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.