Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-11 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco X2, getting a overall score of 80.3 against 79.3. Although the Google Nexus 6P is way older than Xiaomi Poco X2, it's design is lighter and thinner. Xiaomi Poco X2 has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Google Nexus 6P features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has longer battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco X2 shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor, a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.