Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-11 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X2, having a general score of 81.3 against 79.3. The Google Pixel XL is an incredibly older phone than the Xiaomi Poco X2, but it's lighter and just a little thinner anyway. The Xiaomi Poco X2 features a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 4 more CPU cores.
The Google Pixel XL has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels amount per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a back camera with a lot better resolution and a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Google Pixel XL features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco X2 features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.