Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-11 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X2, having a score of 83.7 against 79.3. Even though the LG V50 ThinQ is older than Xiaomi Poco X2, it's body is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Xiaomi Poco X2 has Android 11.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X2. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting photos in poorly lited situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Poco X2 has a little better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.