Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-11 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X2, with a overall score of 81 against 79.3. These devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and Xiaomi Poco X2 has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro design is notably thinner and a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Poco X2, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before.
Xiaomi Poco X2 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit better screen density, a bit larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have 8 processing cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X2 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X2 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.