Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 has a global score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Xiaomi Poco X2 is a older and noticeably thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi managed to make it just a bit lighter anyway. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco X2 has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has a bigger display, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a quite higher number of pixels in each display inch. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 features a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a way less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has longer battery performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.