Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro has an overall score of 84.9, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's 81.6 overall score. Apple iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with Android 10 operating system. Despite of the fact that the Apple iPhone 11 Pro is older than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution, much more display brightness and a quite higher pixels count per inch of screen. IPhone 11 Pro counts with a superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures much clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a very superior battery life than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 69 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.