Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting a general score of 84.5 against 81.6. The iPhone XS Max body is thinner and a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The iPhone XS Max counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1242 x 2688, more brightness and a bit greater pixel number in each inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Apple iPhone XS Max features a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a lower number of cores and 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5160mAh battery size. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much better camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.