Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's 81.6 global score. Google Pixel 2 is an much older phone than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but it is extremely lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit better display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a little worse number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a way bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.