Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is slightly better than Google Pixel XL, getting a score of 81.6 against 81.3. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC design is way newer than Google Pixel XL's, although it is incredibly heavier and just a little bit thicker. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little faster processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater count of pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a lot more mega pixels camera, a way larger back camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a little bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.