Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with an 83.7 score against 81.6. Both of these phones have the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding operating system features. The LG V50 ThinQ design is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, even though it was released about 16 months before.
LG V50 ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a better count of pixels per screen inch.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with better battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5160mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.