Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-09-08 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's general score of 81.6. Samsung Galaxy A32's design is just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, even when both of them were only released 5 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC comes with Android 10 operating system.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because it has a greater pixels density, a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.