Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC design is just a bit lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's thicker and was released 4 years before. These phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a lot brighter display, a larger screen and a little higher pixel density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a much lower 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture, a way higher video quality and a lot larger camera sensor.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 5160mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.