Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-08-29 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than the Apple iPhone 11, with a general score of 85.5 against 83.3. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's construction is just a bit lighter than the Apple iPhone 11, although it is just a bit thicker and was released just a little further than a year before. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit better display than Apple iPhone 11, because although it has much less brightness, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density, a quite larger screen and a higher resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels.
The iPhone 11 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower and 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone 11's camera is very similar to Xiaomi Pocophone F1's camera, and although the Apple iPhone 11 has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos, they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than iPhone 11, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with greater battery performance than Apple iPhone 11, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.