Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-08-29 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a score of 93.3, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's 85.5 overall score. The iPhone 13 Pro body is newer and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's, but it's also heavier. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1170 x 2532, much more brightness and a just a bit greater pixels density.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better storage to install games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB. IPhone 13 Pro counts with a superior processing unit than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with better battery life than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture, they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and a back camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Pocophone F1. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.