Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| -- | iOS 9.x |
| 2018-08-29 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than the iPhone 6s, getting an 85.5 score against 83. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a incredibly newer cellphone than the iPhone 6s, but it's much heavier and somewhat thicker. IPhone 6s counts with a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an additional graphics co-processor.
Apple iPhone 6s has a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, although it has a quite worse screen density, a way worse resolution of 1334 x 750px and a much smaller display, they both have the same brightness. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a 12 MP back-facing camera, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has higher video frame rate, a larger sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has a 133 percent more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.