Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| -- | iOS 9.x |
| 2018-08-29 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 625.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A9 APL1022 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than the iPhone 6s Plus, getting a general score of 85.5 against 84.2. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is a lot newer and a little bit lighter than the iPhone 6s Plus's, but it is also thicker. The iPhone 6s Plus has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, although it has a quite lower pixel count in each display inch, a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little bit smaller display, they both have the same display brightness.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory. Apple iPhone 6s Plus has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lesser RAM memory and less and slower processing cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processor and a GPU.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a 45 percent more battery size. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures slightly better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 6s Plus, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has faster video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture and a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.