Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2018-08-29 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's global score of 85.5. Despite of the fact that iPhone X is older than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, it's design is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. The iPhone X has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has 2 lesser and slower cpu cores and 5 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone X features a slightly better display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution, a little better number of pixels in each display inch and a bit brighter display. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone X, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate and a 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a larger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a really longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 47 percent more battery size.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.