Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2018-08-29 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than Apple iPhone XS, having an 85.5 score against 84.2. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 design is thicker and just a little heavier than Apple iPhone XS. IPhone XS features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density, a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little brighter screen. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone XS, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited situations, they both have the same video frame rate, a back-facing camera with a 12 megapixels, a same size sensor and the same 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much better storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a really longer battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.