Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6's 81.1 global score. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's construction is much newer, just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Google Nexus 6. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little better performance than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
Google Nexus 6 counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a just a bit higher pixel density. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better camera than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with improved battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.