Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-08-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than the Google Pixel, getting a general score of 85.5 against 80.2. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a newer phone than Google Pixel, but it is way heavier and just a little thicker. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better display than Google Pixel, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2246px resolution and a larger screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a larger number of cores and 4 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, a smaller sensor and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2770mAh.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs more money than Google Pixel, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.