Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-08-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's 80 overall score. Although it's the best in this comparison, we must highlight that it's also a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2246px.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, although it has a smaller aperture, a less mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have a same size camera sensor. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, else you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.