Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a XL's general score of 78.9. Even though the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better phone than the Google Pixel 3a XL, it must be told that it's also just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same count of pixels per inch in the screen, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels and a bit bigger screen. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lesser megapixels back facing camera and a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same sensor size.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.