Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-08-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL's general score of 82.9. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is an older and a little bit thicker cellphone than Google Pixel 4 XL, but Xiaomi was able to build it a bit lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a little bit bigger display, more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and the Google Pixel 4 XL feature incredibly similar processors, and although the Google Pixel 4 XL has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images in low-light situations, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.