Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 402 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a global score of 92.1, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's global score of 85.5. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but it's extremely heavier. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a way better display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a really brighter display, a little bit larger screen, a higher resolution of 1280 x 2800 pixels and a just a little greater pixel number in each inch in the display.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 16 GB more RAM. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera with lot more MP and a much bigger aperture.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 1 TB internal memory capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a way better battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 40 percent larger battery size.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Pocophone F1, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.