Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| 2018-08-29 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the HTC U Ultra, with an 85.5 score against 77. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is newer, but a little heavier and somewhat thicker than HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra and Xiaomi Pocophone F1 count with extremely similar screens, because although the HTC U Ultra has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixel density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has an external SD slot that holds 1,7 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images and/or video in low light situations, and they both have a same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.