Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| 2018-08-29 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than HTC U11, having an 85.5 score against 77.6. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is newer than HTC U11's, but it's somewhat thicker and a little heavier. HTC U11 has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with improved battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, a same size sensor and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with faster video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a lot more expensive than the HTC U11, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.