Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| -- | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2018-08-29 | 2018-01-17 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 402 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than HTC U11 EYEs, with a global score of 85.5 against 76.9. Even though the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and HTC U11 EYEs were released only a few months apart, Xiaomi Pocophone F1's body is a bit thicker but also a little bit lighter than HTC U11 EYEs. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit faster processing unit than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better display than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have a greater count of pixels per inch of display, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a bit higher 1080 x 2246 resolution and a bit larger screen. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have a camera in the back with a 12 mega-pixels resolution and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1,7 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little better battery duration than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.