Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is slightly better than LG K92's 85.4 general score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 design is lighter than the LG K92, although it's a little bit thicker and was released 2 years before. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit faster CPU than LG K92, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little sharper display than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2246 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little higher amount of pixels in each display inch. LG K92 has a better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light images, a back camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
LG K92 features a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG K92 features a battery lifetime that's very similar to the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 one.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a little more money than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG K92. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG K92, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.