Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mirror black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than LG Q70's overall score of 77.9. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is a little lighter than LG Q70, but it is a bit thicker and was released about 21 months before. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a little better hardware performance than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit more vivid screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels number in each inch of screen. LG Q70 counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a camera with way more MP and a bigger camera aperture for better low light images.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than LG Q70, because although it has an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and LG Q70 have quite similar batteries performance.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs more than the LG Q70, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.