Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| 2018-08-29 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with an 85.5 score against 81.3. Despite being the best we compare here, it must be noted that it's also a heavier and somewhat thicker phone. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD card slot that allows 1,7 TB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. LG V35 ThinQ's CPU is very similar to Xiaomi Pocophone F1's processor, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures clearer pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution, a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.