Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, getting an 85.5 score against 81.2. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is thicker and just a little heavier than LG V40 ThinQ. The LG V40 ThinQ's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although the LG V40 ThinQ has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a better memory for apps and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 256 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and the LG V40 ThinQ have very similar cameras, because although the LG V40 ThinQ has a tinier sensor capturing worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture for better low light captures and video.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with greater battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent larger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG V40 ThinQ, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.