Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's 85.5 score. The LG V60 ThinQ is a heavier phone than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but both are equally thin. The LG V60 ThinQ's processor is very similar to Xiaomi Pocophone F1's CPU, both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. The LG V60 ThinQ shoots a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera with lot more mega pixels, a bigger camera aperture and a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos.
LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with greater battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG V60 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.