Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, having a general score of 87.1 against 85.5. LG Velvet's body has the same weight than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but it is thinner. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit superior processing unit than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little bit better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels, it also counts with a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen. LG Velvet takes much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG Velvet also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture.
LG Velvet counts with just a bit more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has an 8% bigger battery size.
LG Velvet is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.