Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a global score of 85.5 against 83.4. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a way older and just a bit thicker phone than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but Xiaomi made it just a little bit lighter anyway. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little worse pixel count per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, way more display brightness and a little bit larger screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has much more memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a back camera with a lot higher resolution, a bigger camera aperture, a much bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.