Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 score. Even being the best we are comparing, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is extremely older, just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both of them have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch in the display, a little bigger screen, a better 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a really brighter display. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has an 8% larger battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 50 MP resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.