Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is just a bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, getting a general score of 86.3 against 85.5. Although Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, it's just a little thinner and also newer. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a bit better display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with much more brightness, a little bit bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a much bigger aperture for better low light images and videos, a back facing camera with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a little bit better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.