Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's 85.5 global score. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a little heavier than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, it's just a bit thinner and also way newer. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger display, way more brightness and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a lot bigger sensor and a bigger camera aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.