Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than Moto G Power, getting a global score of 85.5 against 76.1. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Moto G Power, although it was released a bit more more than a year before. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little better performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2246 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixel density. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a superior memory for applications and games than Moto G Power, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, a lower (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
Moto G Power features superior battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G Power. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto G Power, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.