Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-08-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. Even though the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is newer than the Moto Z Force, it is somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier. The Moto Z Force features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better amount of pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a better memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 256 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in low light environments and a worse video definition. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs a lot more money than the Moto Z Force, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.