Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| 2018-08-29 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. Even though Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's noticeably thicker and extremely heavier. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little bit better display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same resolution camera and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality pictures and videos, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and faster video frame rate.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 47% bigger battery size.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.