Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's global score of 85.5. Although the Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit heavier than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, it's thinner and also notably newer. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better performance than Motorola razr (2020). They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a little bit higher 1080 x 2246 resolution and a little bit greater display pixel density. The Motorola razr (2020) features a much better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a lot bigger sensor, a lot more mega pixels back camera and a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have equal 256 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much longer battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.