Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-29 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is an older device than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density. Nubia Red Magic 3S takes better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a lot better video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better memory to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S features longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.