Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than OPPO Find X2, with a general score of 85.5 against 79.7. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's body is a bit lighter than the OPPO Find X2, although it is somewhat thicker and was released just a bit more than a year before. OPPO Find X2 counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, much more brightness and a greater pixels number per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features much more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. OPPO Find X2 has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 shoots better photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light environments, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.