Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having an 85.5 score against 83.1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a lighter phone than OPPO Find X2 Pro, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a little bigger display, a way brighter screen and a higher display density. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with slightly more storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way larger camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos, a lot more MP back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low-light situations.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.