Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-29 | -- |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's general score of 77. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a a bit heavier and thicker phone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit higher display density, way more display brightness and a bit bigger screen. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a way better battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.